This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of gynecologic findings in Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS) by reviewing current international guidelines and identifying relevant gynecologic co-morbidities. METHODS: This consensus statement was developed through a systematic four-phase process: (1) comprehensive literature review across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases (inception-January 2025) using predefined search terms related to IC/BPS and gynecologic conditions; (2) assembly of a 6-member multidisciplinary expert panel including urologists, urogynecologists, gynecologists and pain specialists; (3) consensus development via modified Delphi technique comprising several electronic rating rounds and a face-to-face meeting, with consensus defined as ≥ 80% agreement; and (4) manuscript preparation with iterative review. RESULTS: A number of associated gynecologic disorders may overlap with IC/BPS, our consensus committee identified five main co-morbid disorders: Endometriosis/Adenomyosis, Genito-Pelvic Pain Penetration Disorder/Sexual Dysfunction, Overactive Pelvic Floor Muscles, Hormone- Associated Genitourinary Changes, Vulvodynia/Vestibulodynia. CONCLUSION: While not exhaustive, this consensus highlights the most prevalent gynecologic co-morbidities supported by current literature. Clinical evaluation should prioritize a detailed medical history and pelvic examination to identify these overlapping conditions. Future directions include developing a multidisciplinary diagnostic and treatment algorithm to guide clinicians-including urologists, gynecologists, urogynecologists, physical therapists-in comprehensive IC/BPS care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sullivan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: