Key result
Migraine, particularly migraine with aura, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and a higher prevalence of white matter hyperintensities.
Why the study?
Does migraine increase the risk of cardiovascular events and white matter hyperintensities compared to non-migraineurs?
Does migraine increase the risk of cardiovascular events and white matter hyperintensities compared to non-migraineurs?
Migraine, especially with aura, is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events and is associated with subclinical brain lesions and adverse metabolic profiles, highlighting the need for comprehensive cardiovascular risk management in these patients.
Supports CV risk assessment in migraine with aura; leaves open whether interventions modify outcomes.
The role of migraine as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events has been debated for several years, while it is more established for ischemic stroke. Recently, new studies have examined the likelihood of migraine to determine cardiovascular events, supporting the hypothesis of a predominant role in patients with migraine with aura, the risk including both sexes. In the literature, multiple pathophysiological mechanisms are described to explain this association, and are here discussed. Furthermore, the emerging evidence that a higher headache frequency and long-term migraine may worsen the cardio-metabolic profile in migraineurs (e.g. with a higher Framingham risk score and risk of developing atherosclerosis, insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome) makes it increasingly necessary to reduce the number and severity of attacks, not only to alleviate the painful symptoms, but also to improve the prognosis in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tana et al. (2013) conducted a review in Migraine. Migraine, particularly migraine with aura, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and a higher prevalence of white matter hyperintensities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: