The effects of some film-forming organic additives, fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), vinylene carbonate (VC), and ethylene sulfite (ES), on lithium deposition and dissolution were investigated in 1 M dissolved in propylene carbonate (PC) as a base solution. When 5 wt % FEC was added, the cycling efficiency was improved. On the contrary, addition of 5 wt % VC or ES significantly lowered the cycling efficiency. The surface morphology of lithium deposited in each electrolyte solution was observed by in situ atomic force microscopy (AFM). In the surface was covered with a uniform and closely packed layer of particle-like deposits of about 100-150 nm diam. The surface film seemed to be more solid in and inhomogeneous in From ac impedance measurements, it was revealed that the surface film formed in has a lower resistance than that in the additive-free solution, whereas that formed in or has a higher resistance. Large volume changes during lithium deposition and dissolution require that the surface film should be elastic (or soft) and be self-repairable when being damaged. In addition, a nonuniform current distribution is liable to cause dendrite formation, which requires that the surface film should be uniform and its resistance should be as low as possible. gave a surface film that satisfies all these requirements, and therefore only FEC was effective as an additive for deposition and dissolution of lithium metal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mogi et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: