Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates that 3D-printed heart models improve congenital heart defect knowledge and satisfaction among medical students, suggesting value for hands-on cardiac anatomy training.
Background: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing 3-dimensional (3D)-printed heart models in the education of medical students in a Canadian Medical School.Methods: Three types of 3D-printed modelsdnormal, unrepaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), and surgically repaired adult TOFdwere provided for medical students in their second year of training after a 30-minute lecture.The repaired TOF model depicted a transannular patch, ventricular septal defect closure, and right ventricular outflow tract resection.Knowledge acquisition was measured by comparing pre-and postsession tests consisting of 5 questions.Learner satisfaction ratings were measured with questionnaires completed after the session.A statistical analysis was performed using the t test.Results: Twenty-two medical students participated in the study with 20 students submitting complete data for analysis.The students' score on 5 questions improved after the 3D-printed model session.The average number of correct answers in the test was 2.1 AE 1.0 before the session and 4.3 AE 0.9 after the session (P < 0.001) out of the possible total of 5. Participants reported a high level of satisfaction (86.4%), understanding (86.4%), and usefulness (90.9%) with the incorporation of 3D-printed models in the educational session.Conclusions: An educational session that integrated 3D-printed anatomic models to teach congenital heart disease anatomy significantly enhanced knowledge outcomes.Learner assessment of the impact of the use of the 3D models was highly favourable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: