Key result
Cerebral protection devices see increasing use in cath and EP labs to mitigate cardioembolic risk.
Why the study?
Cerebral protection device use is rapidly increasing across Cath and EP labs, but concerns remain undefined and high-risk patient selection remains subjective.
Does the use of cerebral protection devices reduce the risk of stroke and thromboembolism in patients undergoing transcatheter procedures?
Does the use of cerebral protection devices reduce the risk of stroke and thromboembolism in patients undergoing transcatheter procedures?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review summarizes the current evidence and structural characteristics of cerebral protection devices used to mitigate thromboembolic risk during transcatheter procedures in Cath and EP labs.
Intraprocedural stroke is a well-documented and feared potential risk of cardiovascular transcatheter procedures (TPs). Moreover, subclinical neurological events or covert central nervous system infarctions are concerns related to the development of dementia, future stroke, cognitive decline, and increased risk of mortality. Cerebral protection devices (CPDs) were developed to mitigate the risk of cardioembolic embolism during TPs. They are mechanical barriers designed to cover the ostium of the supra-aortic branches in the aortic arch, but newer devices are able to protect the descending aorta. CPDs have been mainly designed and tested to provide cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but their use in both Catheterization and Electrophysiology laboratories is rapidly increasing. CPDs have allowed us to perform procedures that were previously contraindicated due to high thromboembolic risk, such as in cases of intracardiac thrombosis identified at preprocedural assessment. However, several concerns related to their employment have to be defined. The selection of patients at high risk of thromboembolism is still a subjective choice of each center. The aim of this review is to update the evidence on the use of CPDs in either Cath labs or EP labs, providing an overview of their structural characteristics. Future perspectives focusing on their possible future employment are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Preda et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cardiac Thromboembolism during Transcatheter Procedures. Cerebral protection devices (CPDs) was evaluated. Cerebral protection devices are increasingly used in catheterization and electrophysiology laboratories to mitigate the risk of cardioembolic embolism during transcatheter procedures.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: