Peebles, in a recent review of the anthropology of debt and credit, found an ‘astonishing consistency’ in the moral valuation of credit which is everywhere given a positive evaluation relative to debt. But why is this? Does it apply to creditors as well? What are the theoretical implications of these questions for economic anthropology?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chris Gregory (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: