Why the study?
What are the electrocardiographic characteristics of the escape rhythm in transient complete atrioventricular block induced by transcatheter electrical ablation of the AV junction?
What are the electrocardiographic characteristics of the escape rhythm in transient complete atrioventricular block induced by transcatheter electrical ablation of the AV junction?
The escape rhythm during transient complete heart block induced by AV junction ablation typically presents with a right bundle branch block morphology, suggesting an origin near the site of anatomical damage.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Escape rhythms emerge rapidly post-AV junction ablation; hypothesis-generating for escape focus location, needs prospective validation.
The electrocardiographic characteristics of spontaneous escape rhythm during complete heart block induced by transcatheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction was prospectively studied in 21 patients by periodically interrupting temporary pacing. The data derived from 13 of these 21 patients, in whom conduction recurred after the procedure, were analyzed. An escape rhythm was present in 12 patients 8.2 +/- 5.8 minutes after shock delivery at a cycle length of 1985 +/- 974 ms. The escape QRS had a configuration of right bundle branch block with left axis deviation in 9 patients, of right bundle branch block with normal axis in 1, of left bundle branch block with left axis deviation in 1, and 2 distinct morphologies in the remaining patient. After resumption of conduction, the conducted complexes were identical to the escape complexes in six patients, different only in axis in four patients, and different in morphology in two patients. This suggests that in the majority of patients the escape rhythm seen during transient heart block, induced by transcatheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction, presents a right bundle branch morphology with or without a left axis deviation, and most likely originates from an area above, or close to, the site of the anatomical damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lacombe et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: