Key result
Digital cardiac rehab interventions primarily target physical activity, with only ~33% addressing other core components.
Why the study?
Over 80% of eligible patients do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation, and a systematic evaluation of the comprehensiveness of digital health technologies to address traditional program challenges was lacking.
What core components of cardiac rehabilitation are addressed by current digital health interventions?
Systematic Review (n=31)
What core components of cardiac rehabilitation are addressed by current digital health interventions?
Current digital cardiac rehabilitation interventions predominantly focus on physical activity and exercise, indicating a gap in comprehensive digital management of other core cardiovascular risk factors.
Digital cardiac rehabilitation may incompletely manage risk factors; confirms narrow focus and extends need for broader component coverage.
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite strong evidence supporting the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), over 80% of eligible patients do not participate in CR. Digital health technologies (ie, the delivery of care using the internet, wearable devices, and mobile apps) have the potential to address the challenges associated with traditional facility-based CR programs, but little is known about the comprehensiveness of these interventions to serve as digital approaches to CR. Overall, there is a lack of a systematic evaluation of the current literature on digital interventions for CR. OBJECTIVE The objective of this systematic literature review is to provide an in-depth analysis of the potential of digital health technologies to address the challenges associated with traditional CR. Through this review, we aim to summarize the current literature on digital interventions for CR, identify the key components of CR that have been successfully addressed through digital interventions, and describe the gaps in research that need to be addressed for sustainable and scalable digital CR interventions. METHODS Our strategy for identifying the primary literature pertaining to CR with digital solutions (defined as technology employed to deliver remote care beyond the use of the telephone) included a consultation with an expert in the field of digital CR and searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for original studies published from January 1990 to October 2018. RESULTS Our search returned 31 eligible studies, of which 22 were randomized controlled trials. The reviewed CR interventions primarily targeted physical activity counseling (31/31, 100%), baseline assessment (30/31, 97%), and exercise training (27/31, 87%). The most commonly used modalities were smartphones or mobile devices (20/31, 65%), web-based portals (18/31, 58%), and email-SMS (11/31, 35%). Approximately one-third of the studies addressed the CR core components of nutrition counseling, psychological management, and weight management. In contrast, less than a third of the studies addressed other CR core components, including the management of lipids, diabetes, smoking cessation, and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS Digital technologies have the potential to increase access and participation in CR by mitigating the challenges associated with traditional, facility-based CR. However, previously evaluated interventions primarily focused on physical activity counseling and exercise training. Thus, further research is required with more comprehensive CR interventions and long-term follow-up to understand the clinical impact of digital interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wongvibulsin et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease requiring cardiac rehabilitation (n=31). Digital health interventions was evaluated on Cardiac rehabilitation core components addressed by digital interventions. Digital cardiac rehabilitation interventions primarily targeted physical activity counseling (100%) and exercise training (87%), with less than a third addressing other core components.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: