This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This paper investigates whether changes to late-time physics can resolve the ‘Hubble tension’. It is argued that many of the claims in the literature favouring such solutions are caused by a misunderstanding of how distance ladder measurements actually work and, in particular, by the inappropriate use of a distance ladder H0 prior. A dynamics-free inverse distance ladder shows that changes to late-time physics are strongly constrained observationally and cannot resolve the discrepancy between the SH0ES data and the base ΛCDM cosmology inferred from Planck. We propose a statistically rigorous scheme to replace the use of H0 priors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G. Efstathiou (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: