Key result
Perpendicular catheter contact during PVI is linked to ~226% higher PV reconnection and smaller lesions.
Why the study?
Little was known regarding the effect of catheter contact angle on lesion formation and the durability of pulmonary vein isolation.
Does catheter contact angle affect lesion formation and the durability of pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=16)
Does catheter contact angle affect lesion formation and the durability of pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Perpendicular catheter contact during radiofrequency ablation is associated with smaller lesions and a higher risk of pulmonary vein reconnection.
Perpendicular contact may raise reconnection risk; leaves open whether angle optimization improves PVI durability.
Introduction Little is known on the effect of catheter contact angle on lesion formation and durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Both in vitro experiment and retrospective observational study were conducted. For in vitro experiment, radiofrequency lesions were created on explanted swine hearts in three different catheter contact angles (0°, 45°, and 90°). In the retrospective observational study, we assessed patients who had undergone repeat catheter ablation due to atrial fibrillation recurrence after initial PVI. When pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection was observed, we analyzed the previous ablation points within and without the gap area. The gap areas were defined where ablation had changed the PV activation sequence or eliminated the PV potential in the repeat session. Results In the in vitro experiment, lesion width was the smallest (5.3 ± 0.4 mm) in perpendicular contact compared to 0° (vs 5.8 ± 0.5 mm, p=0.040) and 45° (vs 6.4 ± 0.4 mm, p<0.001). In the retrospective observational study, we assessed 666 tags of 16 patients with PV reconnections, and 60 tags were in the gap area. Tags in the gap area had longer interlesion distance (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, p < 0.001), greater contact force variability (OR 1.03, p = 0.008), and higher rate of perpendicular contact (OR 3.26, p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Perpendicular contact was associated with a smaller lesion and higher rate of PV reconnection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohta et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=16). Perpendicular catheter contact (90°) vs. Non-perpendicular contact (0° and 45°) was evaluated on Presence of ablation tags in the gap area (pulmonary vein reconnection) (OR 3.26, p=< 0.001). Perpendicular catheter contact during pulmonary vein isolation was associated with a higher rate of pulmonary vein reconnection (OR 3.26, p<0.001) and smaller lesion width.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: