Key result
Durable PVI links to greater 6-month QOL improvement than nondurable PVI among patients without AF recurrence.
Why the study?
Although successful PVI can improve quality of life in patients with AF, the specific role of durable PVI in achieving this improvement was unknown.
Does durable pulmonary vein isolation improve quality of life compared to nondurable isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=119)
Does durable pulmonary vein isolation improve quality of life compared to nondurable isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Durable pulmonary vein isolation is associated with greater improvements in quality of life compared to nondurable isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Durable PVI was associated with greater QoL gains in nonrecurrent AF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) can improve the quality of life (QOL) of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the role of durable PVI for such QOL improvement is not known. The aim of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of durable PVI in improving the QOL of patients with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed 119 patients who underwent PVI (age 66.4 ± 9.6 years, 104 paroxysmal AF). A scheduled electrophysiological study was performed 6 months after the first PVI session-regardless of recurrence of AF-to assess the durability of PVI and to identify and re-isolate reconnected pulmonary veins. QOL scores were evaluated by an AF-specific QOL questionnaire and checked at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year after the first session. In patients without AF recurrence (nonrecurrence group, n = 93), the scores at 6 months improved compared with those at baseline; conversely, the scores did not improve in patients with AF recurrence (n = 26). Nevertheless, the scores at 1 year improved compared with those at 6 months in both groups. Within the nonrecurrence group, the score difference between 6 months and baseline was higher in the durable PVI group (n = 58) than that in the nondurable PVI group (n = 35). CONCLUSIONS: The QOL of AF patients improved by the resumption of sinus rhythm following PVI. Patients with durable PVI had increased QOL scores compared with those with nondurable PVI. The durability of PVI may achieve further improvements in the QOL of patients with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inagaki et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=119). Durable pulmonary vein isolation vs. Nondurable pulmonary vein isolation was evaluated on Quality of life (QOL) scores evaluated by an AF-specific QOL questionnaire. Durable pulmonary vein isolation resulted in greater improvement in quality of life scores from baseline to 6 months compared to nondurable PVI among 93 patients without AF recurrence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: