Key result
Patients undergoing elective major rectal cancer surgery in low-volume hospitals had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.49) compared to those in high-volume hospitals.
Why the study?
Does hospital volume impact short-term outcomes in patients undergoing elective major surgery for rectal cancer?
Cohort (n=75,280)
Yes
Does hospital volume impact short-term outcomes in patients undergoing elective major surgery for rectal cancer?
Effect estimate: OR 1.49 (95% CI 1.25-1.78)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.6% vs 0.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
Low hospital volume is independently associated with worse short-term outcomes in rectal cancer surgery, supporting the centralization of care.
Low-volume hospitals were associated with higher in-hospital mortality after rectal cancer surgery; leaves open whether centralization improves outcomes prospectively.
// Salvatore Pucciarelli 1 , Manuel Zorzi 2 , Nicola Gennaro 3 , Francesco Marchegiani 1 , Andrea Barina 1 , Massimo Rugge 2, 4 , Matteo Zuin 1 , Alessandro Perin 1 , Isacco Maretto 1 , Francesca Bergamo 5 , Caterina Boso 6 , Emanuele Damiano Luca Urso 1 , Patrick Frambach 1 and Maria Chiara Corti 3 1 Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy 2 Regional Health Service, Veneto Tumor Registry, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy 3 Regional Health Service, Epidemiology Unit, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy 4 Department of Medicine DIMED, Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy 5 Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy 6 Radiation Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV – IRCCS, Padua, Italy Correspondence to: Salvatore Pucciarelli, email: puc@unipd.it Keywords: rectal cancer; hospital volume; volume-outcome relationship; short-term outcomes; population study Abbreviations: APR: abdominoperineal resection; CI: confidence interval; HV: hospital volume; LOS: length of stay; OR: odds ratio Received: July 12, 2017 Accepted: February 28, 2018 Published: March 30, 2018 ABSTRACT There is growing interest on the potential relationship between hospital volume (HV) and outcomes as it might justify the centralization of care for rectal cancer surgery. From the National Italian Hospital Discharge Dataset, data on 75,280 rectal cancer patients who underwent elective major surgery between 2002 and 2014 were retrieved and analyzed. HV was grouped into tertiles: low-volume performed 1-12, while high-volume hospitals performed 33+ procedures/year. The impact of HV on in-hospital mortality, abdominoperineal resection (APR), 30-day readmission, and length of stay (LOS) was assessed. Risk factors were calculated using multivariate logistic regression. The proportion of procedures performed in low-volume hospitals decreased by 6.7 percent (p<0.001). The rate of in-hospital mortality, APR and 30-day readmission was 1.3%, 16.3%, and 7.2%, respectively, and the median LOS was 13 days. The adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.25-1.78), APR (OR 1.10, 95%CI 1.02-1.19), 30-day readmission (OR 1.49, 95%CI 1.38-1.61), and prolonged LOS (OR 2.29, 95%CI 2.05-2.55) were greater for low-volume hospitals than for high-volume hospitals. This study shows an independent impact of HV procedures on all short-term outcome measures, justifying a policy of centralization for rectal cancer surgery, a process which is underway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pucciarelli et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Rectal cancer (n=75,280). Low-volume hospital (1-12 procedures/year) vs. High-volume hospital (32+ procedures/year) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.25-1.78, p=<0.001). Patients undergoing elective major rectal cancer surgery in low-volume hospitals had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.49) compared to those in high-volume hospitals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: