Key result
Medium-high operative volume ICUs linked to ~45% higher mortality than high-volume units.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether outcomes of postoperative patients admitted directly to an ICU differ based on institutional academic status and the total operative volume of the unit.
Does hospital academic status or operative volume affect mortality and clinical outcomes in postoperative patients requiring intensive care?
Observational (n=22,180)
Yes
Does hospital academic status or operative volume affect mortality and clinical outcomes in postoperative patients requiring intensive care?
Effect estimate: OR 1.45 (95% CI 1.10-1.91)
p-value: p=0.040
Higher operative volume in ICUs is associated with improved survival and shorter length of stay for postoperative patients, whereas academic status does not significantly affect outcomes.
Higher operative volume linked to lower postoperative mortality independent of academic status; observational data leave causal effects and thresholds open for prospective study.
Objective: To determine whether the outcomes of postoperative patients admitted directly to an intensive care unit (ICU) differ based on the academic status of the institution and the total operative volume of the unit. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis using the eICU Collaborative Research Database v2.0, a national database from participating ICUs in the United States. All patients admitted directly to the ICU from the operating room were included. Transfer patients and patients readmitted to the ICU were excluded. Patients were stratified based on admission to an ICU in an academic medical center (AMC) versus non-AMC, and to ICUs with different operative volume experience, after stratification in quartiles (high, medium-high, medium-low, and low volume). Primary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) during ICU stay, ICU length of stay (LOS), and 30-day ventilator free days. Results: Our analysis included 22,180 unique patients; the majority of which (15,085[68%]) were admitted to ICUs in non-AMCs. Cardiac and vascular procedures were the most common types of procedures performed. Patients admitted to AMCs were more likely to be younger and less likely to be Hispanic or Asian. Multivariable logistic regression indicated no meaningful association between academic status and ICU mortality, hospital mortality, initiation of CRRT, duration of ICU LOS, or 30-day ventilator-free-days. Contrarily, medium-high operative volume units had higher ICU mortality (OR = 1.45, 95%CI = 1.10-1.91, p-value = 0.040), higher hospital mortality (OR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.07-1.66, p-value = 0.033), longer ICU LOS (Coefficient = 0.23, 95%CI = 0.07-0.39, p-value = 0.038), and fewer 30-day ventilator-free-days (Coefficient = -0.30, 95%CI = -0.48 – −0.13, p-value = 0.015) compared to their high operative volume counterparts. Conclusions: This study found that a volume-outcome association in the management of postoperative patients requiring ICU level of care immediately after a surgical procedure may exist. The academic status of the institution did not affect the outcomes of these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naar et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Postoperative patients requiring intensive care (n=22,180). Medium-high operative volume ICU vs. High operative volume ICU was evaluated on ICU mortality (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.91, p=0.040). Medium-high operative volume ICUs had higher ICU mortality compared to high operative volume units (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.10-1.91; p=0.040), whereas academic status did not affect outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: