PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2015BioMed Research International32 citationsOpen Access

Computational Depth of Anesthesia via Multiple Vital Signs Based on Artificial Neural Networks

MSMuammar SadrawiSFShou‐Zen FanMAMaysam Abbod

Key Result

An artificial neural network model using multiple vital signs produced a lower mean absolute error and higher correlation coefficient for depth of anesthesia compared to the bispectral index.

Structured PICO

Does an artificial neural network model using multiple vital signs improve the evaluation of depth of anesthesia compared to the bispectral index?

P
Population
63 patients undergoing anesthesia (17 for modeling, 46 for testing)
I
Intervention
Artificial neural network (ANN) model to evaluate depth of anesthesia (DoA) using multiple vital signs (EEG, EMG, HR, pulse, SBP, DBP, SQI)
C
Comparator
Bispectral index (BIS)
O
Outcome
Mean absolute error (MAE) compared to averaged doctor scoressurrogate

An artificial neural network model incorporating multiple vital signs, with EMG being the most significant parameter, provides a more accurate assessment of depth of anesthesia than the standard bispectral index.

Abstract

This study evaluated the depth of anesthesia (DoA) index using artificial neural networks (ANN) which is performed as the modeling technique. Totally 63-patient data is addressed, for both modeling and testing of 17 and 46 patients, respectively. The empirical mode decomposition (EMD) is utilized to purify between the electroencephalography (EEG) signal and the noise. The filtered EEG signal is subsequently extracted to achieve a sample entropy index by every 5-second signal. Then, it is combined with other mean values of vital signs, that is, electromyography (EMG), heart rate (HR), pulse, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and signal quality index (SQI) to evaluate the DoA index as the input. The 5 doctor scores are averaged to obtain an output index. The mean absolute error (MAE) is utilized as the performance evaluation. 10-fold cross-validation is performed in order to generalize the model. The ANN model is compared with the bispectral index (BIS). The results show that the ANN is able to produce lower MAE than BIS. For the correlation coefficient, ANN also has higher value than BIS tested on the 46-patient testing data. Sensitivity analysis and cross-validation method are applied in advance. The results state that EMG has the most effecting parameter, significantly.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sadrawi et al. (2015) studied Depth of anesthesia (n=63). Artificial neural network (ANN) model vs. Bispectral index (BIS) was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) and correlation coefficient. An artificial neural network model using multiple vital signs produced a lower mean absolute error and higher correlation coefficient for depth of anesthesia compared to the bispectral index.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12ec2945487b7639a765eehttps://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536863
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate variability during propofol anesthesia for short-duration procedures in children2003 · 31 citations
  2. 2Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy2000 · 7,928 citations
  3. 3Heart Rate Response to Intravenous Atropine During Propofol Anesthesia2002 · 17 citations
  4. 4Electroencephalographic Derivatives as a Tool for Predicting the Depth of Sedation and Anesthesia Induced by Sevoflurane1998 · 342 citations
  5. 5Local Temporal Common Spatial Patterns for Robust Single-Trial EEG Classification2008 · 97 citations