Key result
The cortical activity index (CAI) algorithm strongly correlated with the bispectral index (r = 0.825) and demonstrated a significant difference in the semiparametric regression model estimate (-0.00995, P=0.0341) for quantifying the depth of anesthesia.
Why the study?
Most monitors for assessing the depth of anesthesia do not include brain activity signal modeling.
Does the cortical activity index (CAI) algorithm accurately quantify the depth of anesthesia compared to the bispectral index (BIS) in patients undergoing general anesthesia?
Observational (n=32)
Does the cortical activity index (CAI) algorithm accurately quantify the depth of anesthesia compared to the bispectral index (BIS) in patients undergoing general anesthesia?
Effect estimate: Pearson correlation coefficient 0.825; Estimate -0.00995
p-value: p=0.0341
The novel cortical activity index (CAI) algorithm strongly correlates with the bispectral index (BIS) and may be a viable alternative for quantifying the depth of anesthesia.
CAI may support BIS alternative use in anesthesia monitoring; leaves open prospective outcome validation before practice change.
Various methods of assessing the depth of anesthesia (DoA) and reducing intraoperative awareness during general anesthesia have been extensively studied in anesthesiology. However, most of the DoA monitors do not include brain activity signal modeling. Here, we propose a new algorithm termed the cortical activity index (CAI) based on the brain activity signals. In this study, we enrolled 32 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Raw electroencephalography (EEG) signals were acquired at a sampling rate of 128 Hz using BIS-VISTA with standard bispectral index (BIS) sensors. All data were stored on a computer for further analysis. The similarities and difference among spectral entropy, the BIS, and CAI were analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficient between the BIS and CAI was 0.825. The result of fitting the semiparametric regression models is the method CAI estimate (-0.00995; P = .0341). It is the estimated difference in the mean of the dependent variable between method BIS and CAI. The CAI algorithm, a simple and intuitive algorithm based on brain activity signal modeling, suggests an intrinsic relationship between the DoA and the EEG waveform. We suggest that the CAI algorithm might be used to quantify the DoA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huh et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia (n=32). Cortical activity index (CAI) vs. Bispectral index (BIS) was evaluated on Correlation and mean difference between CAI and BIS for quantifying depth of anesthesia (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.825; Estimate -0.00995, p=0.0341). The cortical activity index (CAI) algorithm strongly correlated with the bispectral index (r = 0.825) and demonstrated a significant difference in the semiparametric regression model estimate (-0.00995, P=0.0341) for quantifying the depth of anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: