Key result
Electroencephalogram variability analysis (AVMM parameter) achieved a significantly higher AUC of 0.90 for discriminating between awake and anesthesia stages compared to conventional EEG features such as permutation entropy (AUC 0.81).
Why the study?
A new approach of extracting and measuring variability in electroencephalogram was proposed to assess the depth of anesthesia under general anesthesia.
Does EEG variability analysis improve the assessment of depth of anesthesia compared to conventional EEG features in patients undergoing general anesthesia?
Observational (n=56)
No
Does EEG variability analysis improve the assessment of depth of anesthesia compared to conventional EEG features in patients undergoing general anesthesia?
EEG variability analysis provides a promising new method for quantifying EEG to monitor the depth of anesthesia in clinical settings, outperforming conventional EEG features.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid anesthesia monitoring if replicated; leaves open validation in clinical trials and outcome impact.
Objective . In this paper, a new approach of extracting and measuring the variability in electroencephalogram (EEG) was proposed to assess the depth of anesthesia (DOA) under general anesthesia. Approach . The EEG variability (EEGV) was extracted as a fluctuation in time interval that occurs between two local maxima of EEG. Eight parameters related to EEGV were measured in time and frequency domains, and compared with state-of-the-art DOA estimation parameters, including sample entropy, permutation entropy, median frequency and spectral edge frequency of EEG. The area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to validate its performance on 56 patients. Main results . Our proposed EEGV-derived parameters yield significant difference for discriminating between awake and anesthesia stages at a significance level of 0.05, as well as improvement in AUC and correlation coefficient on average, which surpasses the conventional features of EEG in detection accuracy of unconscious state and tracking the level of consciousness. Significance . To sum up, EEGV analysis provides a new perspective in quantifying EEG and corresponding parameters are powerful and promising for monitoring DOA under clinical situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) conducted an observational in General anesthesia (n=56). Electroencephalogram variability (EEGV) analysis vs. Conventional EEG features (Sample entropy, Permutation entropy, Median frequency, Spectral edge frequency) was evaluated on Area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) for discriminating between awake and anesthesia stages (p=<0.05). Electroencephalogram variability analysis (AVMM parameter) achieved a significantly higher AUC of 0.90 for discriminating between awake and anesthesia stages compared to conventional EEG features such as permutation entropy (AUC 0.81).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: