Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In recent years, realism—particularly critical realism—has become an important philosophical and methodological foundation for social science. A key feature is that of natural necessity, but this coexists alongside an acceptance of contingency in the social world. I argue in this paper that there cannot be any natural necessity in the social world, but rather the real nature of the social world is that it is contingent. This need not lead to an abandonment of realism, and indeed I argue that a contingent form of realism allows us to bring ontological probability back into realism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malcolm Williams (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: