Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
= 284) to test for evolutionary continuity and potential age-related changes in social selectivity. Results show that both ape species distribute social resources in ways resembling humans, supporting shared socio-cognitive structuring within the hominoid lineage. Yet clear species differences emerged: bonobos distributed resources more evenly across group members, while chimpanzees concentrated them more selectively. Moreover, chimpanzees-but not bonobos-became increasingly selective with age, mirroring human patterns of intensified interactions with fewer partners in later life. These findings suggest that our closest living relatives structure their social networks in ways that parallel humans', while also pursuing species-specific strategies that reveal both shared evolutionary roots and divergent pathways of primate sociality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leeuwen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: