PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 200895 citations

Lessons from a real world evaluation of anti-phishing training

View Full Paper
PKPonnurangam KumaraguruGuru Gobind Singh Indraprastha UniversitySSSteve ShengCarnegie Mellon UniversityAAAlessandro AcquistiCarnegie Mellon University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Prior laboratory studies have shown that PhishGuru, an embedded training system, is an effective way to teach users to identify phishing scams. PhishGuru users are sent simulated phishing attacks and trained after they fall for the attacks. In this current study, we extend the PhishGuru methodology to train users about spear phishing and test it in a real world setting with employees of a Portuguese company. Our results demonstrate that the findings of PhishGuru laboratory studies do indeed hold up in a real world deployment. Specifically, the results from the field study showed that a large percentage of people who clicked on links in simulated emails proceeded to give some form of personal information to fake phishing websites, and that participants who received PhishGuru training were significantly less likely to fall for subsequent simulated phishing attacks one week later. This paper also presents some additional new findings. First, people trained with spear phishing training material did not make better decisions in identifying spear phishing emails compared to people trained with generic training material. Second, we observed that PhishGuru training could be effective in training other people in the organization who did not receive training messages directly from the system. Third, we also observed that employees in technical jobs were not different from employees with non-technical jobs in identifying phishing emails before and after the training. We conclude with some lessons that we learned in conducting the real world study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumaraguru et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12ef085bb7edc7189e7dd1https://doi.org/10.1109/ecrime.2008.4696970
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Getting users to pay attention to anti-phishing education2007 · 128 citations
  2. 2Fostering E-Mail Security Awareness: The West Point Carronade2005 · 82 citations
  3. 3Why phishing works2006 · 1,318 citations
  4. 4Worked Examples and Tutored Problem Solving:Redundant or Synergistic Forms of Support?2018 · 12 citations
  5. 5Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence1987 · 2,447 citations