Different fates of excessive daytime sleepiness: survival analysis for remission

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

BACKGROUND: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a symptom frequently presented in sleep clinics. Only a paucity of data has addressed clinical courses of sleep disorders with EDS. Therefore, we sought to compare clinical outcomes of patients presenting EDS. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed in the setting of sleep laboratory and outpatient department in a university hospital. One hundred and eight patients who presented EDS underwent polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test. Each patient was diagnosed as one of the following four categories: (1) narcolepsy with cataplexy (N + C; n = 29); (2) narcolepsy without cataplexy (N - C; n = 22); (3) idiopathic hypersomnia (IH; n = 24); and (4) subjective hypersomnolence (SH; n = 33) with mean sleep latency >8 min. Remission of EDS and treatment response were determined based on clinical evaluation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: Remission rates were significantly different (P < 0.001, overall log-rank test) among four groups except those between N - C and IH (P = 0.489). While N + C showed no remission, predicted remission rates of N - C and IH group were 44.6% at 5 years and 32.5% at 5.5 years after diagnosis. The predicted remission rate of SH group was 71.7% at 3 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The similarity of clinical courses between N - C and IH suggests that N - C may be more related to IH compared to N + C. Considering different clinical courses among EDS patients, thorough evaluation of EDS should be warranted before starting treatment.