Key result
Inadequate aspirin adherence in high-risk pregnancies is linked to ~90% greater early-onset preeclampsia risk.
Why the study?
The prevalence of aspirin nonadherence among high-risk pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia and its influence on clinical outcomes remained unclear.
Does adequate adherence to prophylactic aspirin prevent preeclampsia and related complications in high-risk pregnant women?
Cohort (n=220)
Yes
Does adequate adherence to prophylactic aspirin prevent preeclampsia and related complications in high-risk pregnant women?
Effect estimate: OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.1-8.7)
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 17%
p-value: p=0.04
In high-risk pregnancies, adequate adherence (≥90%) to prophylactic aspirin significantly reduces the risk of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and preterm delivery.
May support adherence counseling in high-risk pregnancies; leaves open causal confirmation in randomized trials.
Aspirin nonadherence and its associated increase in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events is well described; however, the prevalence of aspirin nonadherence among high-risk pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia and its influence on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Our study examined the prevalence of aspirin nonadherence and resistance among high-risk pregnant women quantitatively (platelet function analyzer 100 and plasma salicylic acid) and clinical outcomes relative to adherence. High-risk pregnant women were recruited across 3 centers in the South West Sydney Local Health District. Simultaneous clinic data, blood sample, and self-reported adherence assessment were prospectively collected at 4-week intervals from 12 to 36 weeks of gestation. Nonadherence was defined as normal platelet function analyzer 100 and nondetectable plasma salicylic acid in <90% of time points. Value of <90% is based on current data. Two hundred twenty women were recruited over 25 months. No woman was aspirin resistant, and 63 (44%) women demonstrated inadequate adherence. Women with inadequate adherence had higher incidence of early-onset preeclampsia (17% versus 2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1–8.7]; P =0.04), late-onset preeclampsia (41% versus 5%; OR, 4.2 [95% CI, 1.4–19.8]; P =0.04), intrauterine growth restriction (29% versus 5%; OR, 5.8; [95% CI, 1.2–8.3]; P =0.001), preterm delivery (27% versus 10%; OR, 5.2 [95% CI, 1.5–8.7]; P =0.008), and higher likelihood of increase in antihypertensives antenatally (60% versus 10%; OR, 4.6 [95% CI, 1.2–10.5]; P =0.003). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated lower incidence of premature delivery in the ≥90% adherent group (HR, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.2–0.5]; P <0.001).Kappa coefficient agreement between qualitative and quantitative assessment of adherence was moderate (κ=0.48; SE=0.029; P <0.0001). Our data demonstrates that aspirin is an effective prophylactic agent with an absolute risk reduction of 51% (number needed to treat, 2) when adherence is ≥90%, compared with women with inadequate adherence. Women who were <90% adherent had higher rates of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm delivery, and increase in antenatal antihypertensive requirements. Self-reported adherence does not accurately reflect actual adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shanmugalingam et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in High-risk pregnancies at risk of preeclampsia (n=220). Prophylactic aspirin (≥90% adherence) vs. Inadequate adherence (<90%) was evaluated on Early-onset preeclampsia (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-8.7, p=0.04). Inadequate aspirin adherence (<90%) in high-risk pregnancies significantly increased the risk of early-onset preeclampsia (17% vs 2%; OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-8.7; P=0.04) compared to ≥90% adherence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: