This paper examines the reliability improvements gained by using a two-stage restoration strategy rather than a single-stage restoration strategy following fault inception. In a two-stage strategy, a first stage quickly restores a limited set of customers using automated switches. A later stage restores additional customers using manual switches. The strategies are compared using a predictive reliability assessment algorithm capable of modeling each strategy. The impact of two-stage restoration is examined on a 10-MVA test feeder for various levels of feeder automation. Tests show that two-stage restoration significantly reduces customer interruption time for partially automated feeders. Further, single-stage restoration models underestimate the reliability benefits attainable through partial feeder automation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: