Key result
Patient-reported physician recommendations for aspirin use were suboptimal, with only 40.9% of high-risk and 26.0% of low-risk patients being advised to take it for primary prevention.
Why the study?
What are the rates and predictors of patient-reported physician recommendations for aspirin use for primary cardiovascular disease prevention?
Cross-Sectional
What are the rates and predictors of patient-reported physician recommendations for aspirin use for primary cardiovascular disease prevention?
Absolute Event Rate: 40.9% vs 26%
There are nonideal rates of physician recommendations for aspirin use in primary CVD prevention, highlighting a need for clinical decision support tools to improve guideline-directed preventive care.
Suboptimal aspirin recommendations persist in primary CVD prevention; leaves open whether decision support tools improve guideline adherence.
BACKGROUND: Aspirin use has been shown to be an effective tool in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention among high-risk patients. The patient-reported physician recommendation for aspirin as preventive therapy among high- and low-risk patients is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2012 to examine the use of aspirin for CVD prevention. Patients without previously diagnosed CVD were classified into high and low risk based on their Framingham Risk Score (10-year coronary heart disease risk). Among patients without previously diagnosed CVD, 22.5% were classified as high risk. Of the high-risk individuals, 40.9% reported being told by their physician to take aspirin, with 79.0% complying. Among those who were at low risk, 26.0% were told by their physician to take aspirin, with 76.5% complying. Logistic regression analysis indicated that age, access to a regular source of care, education, and insurance status were significant predictors of patient-reported physician recommendations for aspirin use for primary prevention. Among high-risk patients, age, race, and insurance status were significant predictors of reported recommendations for aspirin use. Among low-risk patients, age, education, obesity, and insurance status were significant predictors of reported recommendations for aspirin use. CONCLUSIONS: Patient reports indicate nonideal rates of being told to take aspirin, for both high- and low-risk patients for primary prevention. Clinical decision support tools that could assist physicians in identifying patients at risk may increase patient reports of physician recommendations for aspirin use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mainous et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease prevention. Aspirin vs. Low-risk patients was evaluated on Patient-reported physician recommendation to take aspirin. Patient-reported physician recommendations for aspirin use were suboptimal, with only 40.9% of high-risk and 26.0% of low-risk patients being advised to take it for primary prevention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: