Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The rapid growth of the Internet and the proliferation of technologically enhanced teaching and learning tools have enormous benefits. On one hand, information sharing is cheaper, faster, and easier; and on the other hand, virtual platforms are continuously evolving. However, this massive adoption of digital educational platforms has seemingly engendered wide-spread misconduct amongst students, which now threatens not only academic integrity for unsupervised e-assessments but also the institutional integrity universities and colleges. While the current literature demonstrates the enormity of the mechanisms and approaches designed to combat academic cheating, there is still a persistent global increase in digital academic dishonesty and the plague even evolving. To contribute towards addressing this threat to e-assessment in specific, and academic integrity in general, this study examined the mitigating impact of African ethics on digital academic dishonesty. Therefore, using the pre-test/post-test quasi-experimental design, the impact of ethno-ethics on students' perceived attitudes toward digital academic dishonesty and their likelihood to engage in it was investigated. The study was based on a volunteer sample of 79 first-year Information Technology students recruited from a South African University of Technology. The results show that the approach was effective by over 90% in influencing students' attitudes against digital academic dishonesty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murimo Bethel Mutanga (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: