Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present a novel technique for automatic program correction in MOOCs, capable of fixing both syntactic and semantic errors without manual, problem specific correction strategies. Given an incorrect student program, it generates candidate programs from a distribution of likely corrections, and checks each candidate for correctness against a test suite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pu et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 6 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: