Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical commentary observes limited empirical achievements in neuroeconomics, highlighting that the emerging discipline currently offers theoretical potential rather than practical breakthroughs.
Nobody in this debate questions the point that neuroeconomics remains full of potential, and little else as yet. If so, that really is progress of sorts. I was getting afraid that we would have to open nominations for the Captain Ahab Award for obsessive work on the promotion of neuroeconomics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glenn W. Harrison (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: