Key result
Machine learning predicts inconclusive exercise stress test results with an AUC of 0.83.
Why the study?
Up to 30% of cardiac exercise stress test results are inconclusive or non-diagnostic, resulting in significant resource wastage.
Can a machine learning model using pre-test clinical information accurately predict inconclusive exercise stress test results in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=30,710)
Can a machine learning model using pre-test clinical information accurately predict inconclusive exercise stress test results in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.83
A machine learning model using basic pre-test clinical data can accurately predict inconclusive exercise stress test results, potentially optimizing diagnostic test selection and reducing resource wastage.
May guide EST selection in suspected CAD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac exercise stress testing (EST) offers a non-invasive way in the management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). However, up to 30% EST results are either inconclusive or non-diagnostic, which results in significant resource wastage. Our aim was to build machine learning (ML) based models, using patients demographic (age, sex) and pre-test clinical information (reason for performing test, medications, blood pressure, heart rate, and resting electrocardiogram), capable of predicting EST results beforehand including those with inconclusive or non-diagnostic results. METHODS: A total of 30,710 patients (mean age 54.0 years, 69% male) were included in the study with 25% randomly sampled in the test set, and the remaining samples were split into a train and validation set with a ratio of 9:1. We constructed different ML models from pre-test variables and compared their discriminant power using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A network of Oblivious Decision Trees provided the best discriminant power (AUC=0.83, sensitivity=69%, specificity=0.78%) for predicting inconclusive EST results. A total of 2010 inconclusive ESTs were correctly identified in the testing set. CONCLUSIONS: Our ML model, developed using demographic and pre-test clinical information, can accurately predict EST results and could be used to identify patients with inconclusive or non-diagnostic results beforehand. Our system could thus be used as a personalised decision support tool by clinicians for optimizing the diagnostic test selection strategy for CAD patients and to reduce healthcare expenditure by reducing nondiagnostic or inconclusive ESTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=30,710). Machine learning model (network of Oblivious Decision Trees) was evaluated on Predicting inconclusive exercise stress test results (AUC 0.83). A machine learning model using demographic and pre-test clinical information accurately predicted inconclusive exercise stress test results with an AUC of 0.83.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: