Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper seeks to think of location from the perspective of belonging to rethink a "politics of location" as a "politics of relation." I draw upon literature from third world and antiracist feminisms and cultural studies in order to ask: what gets left out when the conditions and effects of belonging to a "location" are assumed as a starting point for our theorizing? To map out and interrogate such conditions create new possibilities for theorizing collective subjectivity. And by extension, a politics of relation asks us to interrogate how we may hold ourselves accountable for who we are (becoming, as a function of belonging), and the collective conditions out of which our agency, experience, and consciousness emerge. I propose "differential belonging"—a tactical maneuvering across resistive communities—as a vehicle for feminist subjects to rewrite/reverse processes of interpellation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aimee Carrillo Rowe (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: