Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigated personal and organizational functioning following an acute disaster in an explosives factory in which 14 people were killed and 14 others were injured. Multivariate analyses of covari-ance (controlling for age and organizational tenure) assessed whether there were any differences between the experimental group (40 individuals physically exposed to the explosion) and two control groups (one from the same site performing a different job, the second from a separate site performing the same job; n = 76 and n = 40, respectively). During the 2nd week following the blast and 2 months afterward, there were no between-group differences in terms of job satisfaction, organizational com-mitment, marital satisfaction, or psychological distress. Failure to find any differences was attributed to the acute (as opposed to chronic) nature of the disaster. At both time periods, family support was correlated with personal functioning, whereas supervisory support was associated with job satisfac-tion; this is discussed in terms of the source of the stressor being consistent with the source of the support and the nature of the outcome. Research on work stress and its consequences is increasing tremendously (Staw, 1984). Because ethical considerations and problems of generalizability largely rule out the induction of
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barling et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: