This updated Italian guideline provides a personalized medicine approach to choosing between carotid endarterectomy and stenting for patients with carotid stenosis.
Enables tailored CEA vs stenting decisions now; extends prior guidelines via patient-specific risk-benefit modeling.
Although proof-based medicine has generated much valid evidence for the drawing up of guidelines and recommendations for best clinical practice in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, whether and when it is better to employ endarterectomy or stenting as the intervention of choice still remain matters of debate. Moreover, guidelines have been targeted up to now to the 'representative' patient, as resulting from the statistical analyses of the studies conducted on the safety and efficacy of both interventions as well as on medical therapy alone. The Italian Stroke Organization (ISO) and Stroke Prevention and Awareness Diffusion (SPREAD) group has thus decided to update its statements for an 8th edition. To this end, a multidisciplinary team of authors representing Italian scientific societies in the neurology, neuroradiology, vascular and endovascular surgery, interventional cardiology, and general medicine fields re-examined the literature available on stroke. Analyses and considerations on patient subgroups have allowed to model the risks/benefits of endarterectomy and stenting in the individual. Accordingly, the guideline's original methodology has been revised to follow the new SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network) Grade-like approach, integrating it with new considerations on Precision, or Personalized Medicine. Therefore, this guideline offers recommendations on precision medicine for the single patient, and can be followed in addition to the more standard guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanza et al. (2017) conducted a review in Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid endarterectomy and stenting guidelines was evaluated. Updated Italian Stroke Organization guidelines provide personalized medicine recommendations for carotid endarterectomy and stenting based on individual patient risk-benefit modeling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: