Why the study?
Current guidelines on carotid endarterectomy and stenting are based on RCTs with rigid inclusion criteria that often exclude multimorbid patients, limiting applicability to complex real-world cases.
Does personalized medicine enhance guidelines for carotid endarterectomy and stenting in stroke prevention?
Does personalized medicine enhance guidelines for carotid endarterectomy and stenting in stroke prevention?
Personalized medicine approaches should be integrated into guidelines for carotid endarterectomy and stenting to account for individual patient characteristics and multimorbidities.
Alerts clinicians to limited generalizability of guidelines in multimorbid patients; challenges RCT-centric EBM and extends research to inclusive cohorts.
Current guidelines are founded on evidence-based medicine (EBM), a method that privileges results from randomized control trials (RCTs). However, RCTs are frequently conducted on cohorts selected on the basis of rigid inclusion criteria, often excluding patients with multimorbidities, a condition that is becoming increasingly prevalent in the real world. The resulting recommendations may, therefore, be targeted to the “representative” patient, as resulting from the statistical mean of the RCTs, and risk being applied rigidly to patients that more often than not present with a more complex clinical picture than that modeled in the pivotal trials. The new paradigm to overcome this limitation is Personalized Medicine, which aims to take into account the particular characteristics displayed by the individual. Guidelines on carotid endarterectomy and stenting must thus be integrated with “tailored” or “personalized” recommendations. The authors thus reviewed the literature available on carotid endarterectomy and stenting for stroke prevention, taking into account risk/benefit models and evidence on subgroups. This guideline offers new recommendations on Personalized Medicine for carotid endarterectomy and stenting that can be followed in addition to classical recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanza et al. (2019) conducted a review in Stroke prevention. Personalized medicine recommendations for carotid endarterectomy and stenting vs. Classical recommendations was evaluated. A literature review on carotid endarterectomy and stenting for stroke prevention provides new personalized medicine recommendations to supplement classical guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: