Key result
SHOB-D2AF score improves prediction of poor anticoagulation control by ~18% over SAMe-TT2R2.
Why the study?
Previous trials showed that the C-statistics of the SAMe-TT2R2 score in predicting suboptimal time in therapeutic range is very low, prompting the development of a novel prediction model.
Does the SHOB-D2AF score improve the prediction of poor anticoagulation control compared to the SAMe-TT2R2 score in patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin?
Cohort (n=2,233)
Yes
Does the SHOB-D2AF score improve the prediction of poor anticoagulation control compared to the SAMe-TT2R2 score in patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin?
The novel SHOB-D2AF score provides modestly better discrimination than the SAMe-TT2R2 score for predicting poor anticoagulation control in Thai patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin.
May modestly improve prediction of poor anticoagulation control in AF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Previous trials have shown that the C-statistics of SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score in the prediction of suboptimal time in therapeutic range (TTR) is very low. Objectives To propose the novel risk score model for predicting the poor anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients compared with the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score. Methods We prospectively recruited AF patients from 27 hospitals between 2014 and 2017 in the COOL AF Thailand registry. The poor anticoagulation control was defined as TTR <65%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for the prediction of poor anticoagulation control. The novel risk score model was then generated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the C-statistics and to compare between the novel risk score model and the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score. Net Reclassification Index (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Index (IDI) were performed. Results Of 3,461 patients, 2,233 patients taking warfarin having available TTR data were retrieved. There were 1,432 patients having poor anticoagulation control (TTR < 65%) and 801 patients having good anticoagulation control (TTR ≥ 65%). Symptomatic AF, diabetes, heart failure, and a history of bleeding were associated with increased risk while obesity, AF duration, and paroxysmal AF were associated with decreased risk of poor anticoagulation control. SHOB-D 2 AF score was created. The C-statistics of SHOB-D 2 AF score was greater than the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score (0.584 vs 0.506, P < 0.001). NRI of the SHOB-D 2 AF score was 17.82% compared with the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score. Conclusions SHOB-D 2 AF score was the novel risk score which was better than the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score in predicting poor anticoagulation control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Methavigul et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=2,233). SHOB-D2AF score vs. SAMe-TT2R2 score was evaluated on Prediction of poor anticoagulation control (Time in Therapeutic Range < 65%) measured by C-statistic (NRI 17.82%, 95% CI 9.20-26.44, p=<0.001). The SHOB-D2AF score significantly improved the prediction of poor anticoagulation control compared to the SAMe-TT2R2 score, with a higher C-statistic (0.584 vs 0.506) and an NRI of 17.82%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: