Key result
Hybrid education for ACHD professionals increases satisfaction to ~98% in year two.
Why the study?
The growing adult congenital heart disease population requires lifelong specialized care, driving the need for continuous education among health care teams.
Does a hybrid education program improve engagement and perceived usefulness among nurses and allied health professionals caring for adults with congenital heart disease?
Does a hybrid education program improve engagement and perceived usefulness among nurses and allied health professionals caring for adults with congenital heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 98% vs 93%
A hybrid education program for healthcare professionals in adult congenital heart disease care demonstrated high and increasing satisfaction levels over two years.
Supports hybrid education for adult congenital heart disease providers; leaves open translation to skills or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The population of adults with congenital heart disease is rapidly increasing, highlighting the need for lifelong access to specialized care. To provide up-to-date care, health care teams require continuous education. Digital platforms allow for hybrid learning opportunities, combining in-person and online education. Hybrid training has become an increasingly popular means of delivering continuous education to health care professionals, offering flexibility, accessibility, and ongoing professional development. Hybrid models enable health care teams to remain engaged and current, ensuring the delivery of high-quality care. This article describes the role of hybrid education in the professional development of nurses and allied health professionals. METHOD: This mixed methods study assessed participant engagement, perceived usefulness, and areas for improvement after an education program. RESULTS: Virtual platforms and participant feedback allowed health care professionals to engage in ongoing learning. The hybrid model offered flexibility and accessibility. CONCLUSION: Refining educational content based on participant feedback enhanced the learning experience and session effectiveness. With satisfaction levels increasing from 93% in year 1 to 98% in year 2, this feedback-driven approach helped to tailor the program to participant needs and may help improve quality of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Habibi et al. (2025) studied Professional development for healthcare providers of adults with congenital heart disease. Hybrid education program was evaluated on Satisfaction levels. A hybrid education program for healthcare professionals caring for adults with congenital heart disease increased satisfaction levels from 93% in year 1 to 98% in year 2.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: