This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Cryptocurrencies to date, most notably Bitcoin, have primarily relied on a proof-of-work system to validate and process transactions on the blockchain. Proof-of-work systems have, however, several limitations, such as enormous energy demands, and so are likely to be replaced by proof-of-stake systems. These systems use a mechanism that does not rely on mining power but the amount of stake owned by a node, allowing randomly selected validators to create blocks and verify blocks created by other validators. Proof-of-stake systems naturally result in staking pools where in a third party organisation operates validators on behalf of investors who have staked in the currency. Given they have oversight for a large amount of staked currency, staking pools are a prime target for malicious actors. In this paper we explore the economic implications of an attack on a staking pool. We pay particular attention to how the staking pool and clients could resolve an extortion attack by a malicious actor who has accessed relevant signing keys.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhudia et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: