Key result
The Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors fulfilled ANSI/AAMI/ISO validation criteria, with mean SBP differences vs reference of -0.9 and 2.4 mm Hg.
Why the study?
Watch-type wearable devices could help identify daytime masked hypertension and blood pressure variability in real-life conditions, but require clinical validation of accuracy.
Are the Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors accurate compared to reference measurements according to ANSI/AAMI/ISO guidelines?
Comparison
Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL watch-type devices vs reference blood pressure measurements
Design
Device validation study according to ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 guidelines
Authors
Loading...
Validates two watch-type BP monitors per ANSI/AAMI/ISO criteria; leaves open real-world accuracy and outcome impact.
Observational
Are the Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors accurate compared to reference measurements according to ANSI/AAMI/ISO guidelines?
The Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors are accurate and fulfill the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 validation guidelines, supporting their potential use for identifying masked hypertension and blood pressure variability.
Kuwabara et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Blood pressure measurement. Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors vs. Reference blood pressure measurements was evaluated on Validation according to ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 guidelines criteria 1 and 2. The Omron HEM-6410T-ZM and HEM-6410T-ZL watch-type wearable blood pressure monitors fulfilled ANSI/AAMI/ISO validation criteria, with mean SBP differences vs reference of -0.9 and 2.4 mm Hg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: