Key result
Low edoxaban concentrations linked to ~313% greater SSE risk, driven by 15-mg regimen underexposure.
Why the study?
This study investigated real-world edoxaban concentrations across different dosing regimens, focusing specifically on patients meeting the ELDERCARE-AF trial inclusion criteria for low-dose edoxaban.
Does the 15-mg edoxaban regimen result in low drug concentrations and increased risk of thromboembolic events compared to the 30-mg regimen in older patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=402)
Does the 15-mg edoxaban regimen result in low drug concentrations and increased risk of thromboembolic events compared to the 30-mg regimen in older patients with atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: aHR 4.13 (95% CI 1.08-15.82)
In older patients with atrial fibrillation, the 15-mg edoxaban regimen frequently leads to subtherapeutic drug concentrations, particularly in those with CrCL > 50 mL/min, which is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events.
May warrant caution with 15-mg edoxaban in older AF patients; leaves open whether dose optimization reduces thromboembolic risk.
This study investigated real‐world edoxaban concentrations across different dosing regimens, with a specific focus on patients who met the inclusion criteria of low‐dose edoxaban for the Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation (ELDERCARE‐AF) trial. Patients with atrial fibrillation receiving edoxaban were enrolled to measure trough concentrations. The levels were compared with the expected therapeutic range (12–43 ng/mL) to define low or high concentrations. Data on ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism (SSE), and major bleeding, were collected prospectively. In total, 402 patients (77.2 ± 10.6 years; 52.2% men) were included. The SSE incidence was 1.22 (0.56–2.31) per 100 person years and was significantly associated with low edoxaban concentration (aHR, 4.13 [1.08–15.82]). Among patients meeting the ELDERCARE‐AF criteria ( n = 160), the use of the 15‐mg regimen (ELDER‐15 mg, n = 46) vs. the 30‐mg regimen (ELDER‐30 mg, n = 114) (aOR, 7.65 [2.92–20.09]), higher creatinine clearance (CrCL) (aOR, 1.05 [1.01–1.08]) and lower CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VA score (aOR, 0.69 [0.51, 0.95]) were significantly associated with low concentrations. In the ELDER‐15 mg group, patients with CrCL > 50 mL/min had more than 50% probability of exhibiting low drug concentrations. The incidence of SSE was numerically higher in the ELDER‐15 mg group than the ELDER‐30 mg group (2.34 [0.06–13.02] vs. 1.55 [0.32–4.52]), while major bleeding rates were similar (4.67 [0.57–16.89] vs. 5.15 [2.47–9.48]). In conclusion, low edoxaban concentrations have been associated with thromboembolic events. Among ELDERCARE‐AF‐eligible patients, the 15‐mg regimen results in underexposure to edoxaban, particularly when the CrCL exceeded 50 mL/min.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=402). Edoxaban vs. Expected therapeutic range (12-43 ng/mL) was evaluated on Ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism (SSE) associated with low edoxaban concentration (aHR 4.13, 95% CI 1.08-15.82). Low edoxaban concentrations were significantly associated with ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism (aHR 4.13; 95% CI 1.08-15.82), with the 15-mg regimen resulting in underexposure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: