Key result
AI-guided CTI ablation with 3D mapping is linked to ~88% shorter fluoroscopy time versus conventional ablation.
Why the study?
The feasibility and safety of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with contiguous lesions using ablation index under the guidance of fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping in typical atrial flutter remained uncertain.
Does AI-guided CTI ablation with contiguous lesions under fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping improve procedural outcomes compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial flutter?
Observational (n=181)
None
None
No
Does AI-guided CTI ablation with contiguous lesions under fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping improve procedural outcomes compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial flutter?
AI-guided CTI ablation with contiguous lesions and fluoroscopy-integrated 3D mapping is feasible and significantly reduces fluoroscopy and radiofrequency times compared to conventional ablation in patients with atrial flutter.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shorter fluoroscopy times with AI-guided CTI ablation; leaves open impact on first-pass block rates.
PURPOSE: The feasibility and safety of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation with contiguous lesions using ablation index (AI) under the guidance of fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping (CARTO UNIVU/CU) in typical atrial flutter (AFL) remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of AI-guided CTI ablation with contiguous lesions in patients with AFL. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, observational study, procedural outcomes were determined in 151 patients undergoing AI-guided CTI ablation (AI group) with a target AI value of 450 and an interlesion distance of ≤ 4 mm under CU guidance. These outcomes were compared with those of 30 patients undergoing non-AI-guided ablation (non-AI group). RESULTS: Among 151 patients, first-pass conduction block was achieved in 120 (80%) patients in the AI group (67% in the non-AI group, P = 0.152) with a shorter fluoroscopy time of 0.2 ± 0.4 min (1.7 ± 2.0 min in the non-AI group, P < 0.001). Conduction gaps were located at the atrial aspects near the inferior vena cava in 24 of 31 (78%) patients without first-pass conduction block. The AI group received 11 ± 5 (12 ± 4 in the non-AI group, P = 0.098) radiofrequency (RF) applications, and the RF time was 4.2 ± 2.4 (5.1 ± 2.5 min in the non-AI group, P = 0.011). Despite the occurrence of steam pop in 3 (2%) patients, none of them developed cardiac tamponade. No patients had recurrence within 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: AI-guided CTI ablation in combination with CU was feasible and effective in reducing radiation exposure in patients with AFL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakama et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial flutter (n=181). Ablation index-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with CARTO UNIVU vs. Conventional non-AI-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was evaluated on Fluoroscopy time (minutes) (p=<0.001). Ablation index-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping significantly reduced fluoroscopy time to 0.2 minutes compared to 1.7 minutes with conventional ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: