Key result
Follow-up screening detects incident AF or AT in ~28% of patients after atrial flutter ablation.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of standardized follow-up for detecting atrial fibrillation after common atrial flutter ablation had not been prospectively evaluated.
Does a standardized follow-up protocol effectively detect incident atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia in patients after common atrial flutter ablation?
Cohort (n=309)
Yes
Does a standardized follow-up protocol effectively detect incident atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia in patients after common atrial flutter ablation?
A standardized 1-year follow-up including 24-hour Holter ECGs detects a high rate (28.2%) of incident AF or AT in patients after typical atrial flutter ablation, highlighting the need for careful consideration of long-term anticoagulation.
May support routine monitoring after flutter ablation; leaves open effects on anticoagulation and outcomes.
Aims: We aimed to prospectively investigate the effectiveness of a standardized follow-up for AF-detection after common atrial flutter (cAFL) ablation. Methods: A total of 309 patients after cAFL ablation without known AF, from 5 centers, and at least one completed, standardized follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months, including a 24 h Holter-electrocardiogram (ECG), were included. The primary outcome was incident atrial fibrillation (AF), or atrial tachycardia (AT). Predictors were investigated by Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: The mean age was 67.9 years; 15.2% were female and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke, Vascular disease, Sex category) score was 2.4 points. The great majority of patients (90.3%) were anticoagulated. Over a mean follow-up of 12.2 months with a standardized approach, AF/AT was detected in 73 patients, corresponding to 11.7% at 3 months, 18.4% at 6 months and 28.2% at 12 months of follow-up. AF was found in 64 patients, AT in 9 and both in 2 patients. Occurrence of AF was recorded in 40 (60.6%) patients by Holter-ECG and in the remaining 26 (39.4%) by clinical follow-up only. There was no difference in male versus female (p = 0.08), or in younger versus older patients (p = 0.96) for AF/AT detection. Only coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [95% confidence intervals] 1.03 [1.01–1.05], p = 0.01) was associated with the primary outcome. Conclusions: AF or AT was detected in a large proportion of cAFL patients after cavotricuspid-isthmus (CTI) ablation, using a standardized follow-up over 1 year. This standardized screening can be easily implemented with high patient acceptance. The high proportion of post-ablation AF needs to be taken into consideration when deciding on long-term oral anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krisai et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in common atrial flutter (cAFL) after ablation (n=309). Standardized follow-up screening (clinical and 24h Holter-ECG) was evaluated on incident atrial fibrillation (AF), or atrial tachycardia (AT). A standardized follow-up screening over 1 year detected incident atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia in 28.2% of patients after common atrial flutter ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: