Key result
A history of typical atrial flutter was a strong independent predictor for new onset atrial fibrillation (HR 3.82) compared to high-risk patients without flutter.
Why the study?
Patients undergoing CTI ablation for typical AFL frequently develop new onset AF, prompting the need to evaluate incidence and predictors to stratify thromboembolic risk.
What are the predictors of new onset atrial fibrillation in patients at high risk, specifically those undergoing typical atrial flutter ablation?
Cohort (n=70)
No
What are the predictors of new onset atrial fibrillation in patients at high risk, specifically those undergoing typical atrial flutter ablation?
Hazard Ratio: 3.82 (95% CI 1.46–10.03)
Absolute Event Rate: 56.3% vs 22.7%
p-value: p=0.006
In patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation, a high PACE score and prolonged HV interval strongly predict new-onset atrial fibrillation, potentially guiding empiric long-term anticoagulation decisions.
Purpose: Patients undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for typical flutter (AFL) have a high incidence of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to analyze the incidence and predictors for new onset AF in this subset of patients to stratify thromboembolic risk. Methods: Between 2016 and 2019, 70 patients without history of AF but with high-risk for developing AF, based on a recent AFL ablation or a high PACE score for AF risk, were prospectively included. All patients were monitored continuously by implantable loop recorder and followed by remote monitoring. Results: Overall 48 patients were included after CTI ablation and 22 patients were included based on a high PACE score. New onset AF rate at 12 months was significantly higher in the AFL group compared to PACE group (56.3% vs 22.7%, p=0.011). History of AFL was the only independent predictor for new onset AF (HR:3.82; 95% CI:1.46-10.03; p=0.006) at a median follow-up of 12 months (Q1-Q3:4-19 months). In the AFL group, two very strong independent predictors for new onset AF were a PACE score ³30 (HR:6.9; 95% CI:1.71-27.91; p=0.007) and HV interval ³55 (HR:11.86; 95% CI:2.57-54.8; p=0.002). Conclusions: AFL is the most important predictor for new onset AF. In patients undergoing AFL ablation, a high PACE score and/or long HV interval predict even higher risk, and may be useful in decision for empiric long-term anticoagulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vallès et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in High risk for atrial fibrillation (n=70). History of typical atrial flutter vs. High PACE score without atrial flutter was evaluated on New onset atrial fibrillation (HR 3.82, 95% CI 1.46-10.03, p=0.006). A history of typical atrial flutter was a strong independent predictor for new onset atrial fibrillation (HR 3.82) compared to high-risk patients without flutter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: