Why the study?
What are the electrophysiologic findings and outcomes in patients with syncope of unknown origin?
What are the electrophysiologic findings and outcomes in patients with syncope of unknown origin?
In patients with unexplained syncope, electrophysiologic studies identified a cause in 30%, and female gender was an independent predictor of a favorable outcome.
Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 134 patients (87 males, mean age 59 years) with unexplained syncope. Seventy-one patients had organic heart disease (ischaemic in 50). Electrophysiologic studies revealed conduction abnormalities and tachyarrhythmias that could account for syncope in 40 patients (30%). Thirty-seven (93%) of these patients received pacing or antiarrhythmic therapy compared with 23 (24%) of the remaining 94 patients who had a negative study and received empiric therapy (P less than 0.0001). Risk of having an abnormal electrophysiologic study was greater in patients with underlying heart disease (P less than 0.05). During a mean follow-up of 22 +/- 17 months, 26 patients (19%) either had recurrent syncope (22 patients) or died (four patients) suddenly. Men had a higher incidence of recurrent syncope than women (26% vs 6%, P less than 0.005). Other clinical characteristics, electrophysiologic findings, final diagnosis and therapy at discharge were not predictive of outcome. We conclude that (1) 19% of patients investigated for syncope will have a recurrent event, (2) female gender may be an independent predictor of favourable outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: