Key result
Cardiac implantable electronic devices in Takotsubo syndrome patients were associated with significantly higher rates of cardiogenic shock (66.6% vs 16.6%) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.4% vs 5.3%) compared to no device.
Why the study?
Recent studies have reported life-threatening arrhythmias in takotsubo syndrome patients, but the short- and long-term usefulness of cardiac implantable electronic devices remained unclear.
Observational (n=142)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recent studies have reported that takotsubo syndrome (TTS) patients are suffering from life-threatening arrhythmias. The aim of our study was to understand the short and long-term usefulness of cardiac implantable electronic devices in TTS patients.We constituted a collective of 142 patients in a bi-centric study diagnosed with TTS between 2003 and 2017. The patient groups, divided according to the treatment with (n = 9, 6.3%) or without cardiac devices (n = 133, 93.7%), were followed-up to determine the importance of devices and its complications. One patient was treated with a permanent pacemaker, five patients with a wearable cardioverter defibrillator, two patients with a subcutaneous defibrillator and one patient with a transvenous defibrillator. Regular device check-up was documented in all patients, presenting an ongoing high-degree AV-block. Neither device complications nor life-threatening tachyarrhythmias were documented after acute TTS event. However, patients comprising the device group suffered significantly more often from a highly reduced EF (30 ± 7.7% versus 39.1 ± 9.7%; p < 0.05), cardiogenic shock with use of inotropic agents (66.6% versus 16.6%; p < 0.05) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.4% versus 5.3%; p < 0.05). Our data confirm the usefulness of pacemaker in TTS patients. However, the cardioverter defibrillator including wearable cardioverter defibrillator may not be recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Battrawy et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Takotsubo syndrome (n=142). Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CiED) vs. No device was evaluated on Cardiogenic shock (p=<0.01). Cardiac implantable electronic devices in Takotsubo syndrome patients were associated with significantly higher rates of cardiogenic shock (66.6% vs 16.6%) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.4% vs 5.3%) compared to no device.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: