Key result
Time- and frequency-domain measures of pulse rate variability showed strong correlations and moderate to high agreement with heart rate variability in chronically instrumented rabbits.
Why the study?
Is pulse rate variability an acceptable surrogate for heart rate variability in chronically instrumented rabbits?
Is pulse rate variability an acceptable surrogate for heart rate variability in chronically instrumented rabbits?
Time- and frequency-domain measures of PRV are acceptable surrogates for HRV in instrumented rabbits, but caution is needed for nonlinear measures or when HRV is very low.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PRV monitoring in rabbit models; leaves open human translation and nonlinear index validation.
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a function of cardiac autonomic tone that is widely used in both clinical and animal studies. In preclinical studies, HRV measures are frequently derived using the arterial pulse waveform from an implanted pressure telemetry device, termed pulse rate variability (PRV), instead of the electrocardiogram signal in accordance with clinical guidelines. The acceptability of PRV as a surrogate for HRV in instrumented animals is unknown. Using rabbits implanted with intracardiac leads and chronically implanted pressure transducers, we investigated the correlation and agreement of time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear indexes of HRV and PRV at baseline. We also investigated the effects of ventricular pacing and autonomic blockade on both measures. At baseline, HRV and PRV time- and frequency-domain parameters showed robust correlations and moderate to high agreement, whereas nonlinear parameters showed slightly weaker correlations and varied agreement. Ventricular pacing almost completely eliminated HRV, and spectral analysis of the PRV signal revealed a HRV-independent rhythm. After cardiac autonomic blockade with atropine or metoprolol, the changes in time- and non-normalized frequency-domain measures of PRV continued to show strong correlations and moderate to high agreement with corresponding changes in HRV measures. Blockade-induced changes in nonlinear PRV indexes correlated poorly with HRV changes and showed weak agreement. These results suggest that time- and frequency-domain measures of PRV are acceptable surrogates for HRV even in the context of changing cardiac autonomic tone, but caution should be used when nonlinear measures are a primary end point or when HRV is very low as HRV-independent rhythms may predominate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pellegrino et al. (2014) studied Healthy (chronically instrumented) (n=8). Pulse rate variability (PRV) via arterial pressure radiotelemeter vs. Heart rate variability (HRV) via ECG was evaluated on Correlation and agreement of time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear indexes of HRV and PRV. Time- and frequency-domain measures of pulse rate variability showed strong correlations and moderate to high agreement with heart rate variability in chronically instrumented rabbits.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: