Key result
Intradialytic hypotension linked to a ~9-fold higher rate of clinically significant arrhythmia during hemodialysis.
Why the study?
Intradialytic hypotension is common during hemodialysis and associated with reduced myocardial perfusion, a potential risk factor for cardiac arrhythmia.
Does intradialytic hypotension increase the risk of clinically significant arrhythmias in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis?
Observational (n=66)
Yes
Does intradialytic hypotension increase the risk of clinically significant arrhythmias in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis?
Intradialytic hypotension is strongly associated with an increased risk of clinically significant arrhythmias during hemodialysis sessions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intradialytic hypotension may warrant arrhythmia vigilance during hemodialysis; leaves open whether BP stabilization reduces events in trials.
Background and objectives Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD) have a high incidence of cardiac events, including arrhythmia and sudden death. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of HD and is associated with development of reduced myocardial perfusion, a potential risk factor for arrhythmia. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We analyzed data from the Monitoring in Dialysis study, which used implantable loop recorders to detect and continuously monitor electrocardiographic data from patients on maintenance HD ( n =66 from the United States and India) over a 6-month period ( n =4720 sessions). Negative binomial mixed effects regression was used to test the association of IDH 20 (decline in systolic BP >20 mm Hg from predialysis systolic BP) and IDH 0–20 (decline in systolic BP 0–20 mm Hg from predialysis systolic BP) with clinically significant arrhythmia (bradycardia≤40 bpm for ≥6 seconds, asystole≥3 seconds, ventricular tachycardia ≥130 bpm for ≥30 seconds, or patient-marked events) during HD. Results The median age of participants was 58 (25th–75th percentile, 49–66) years; 70% were male; and 65% were from the United States. IDH occurred in 2251 (48%) of the 4720 HD sessions analyzed, whereas IDH 0–20 occurred during 1773 sessions (38%). The number of sessions complicated by least one intradialytic clinically significant arrhythmia was 27 (1.2%) where IDH 20 occurred and 15 (0.8%) where IDH 0–20 occurred. Participants who experienced IDH 20 (versus not) had a nine-fold greater rate of developing an intradialytic clinically significant arrhythmia (incidence rate ratio, 9.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.0 to 29.4), whereas IDH 0–20 was associated with a seven-fold higher rate (incidence rate ratio, 7.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 25.4). Conclusions IDH is common in patients on maintenance HD and is associated with a greater risk of developing intradialytic clinically significant arrhythmia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Causland et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Maintenance hemodialysis (n=66). Intradialytic hypotension (IDH 20) vs. No intradialytic hypotension was evaluated on Clinically significant arrhythmia during hemodialysis (IRR 9.4, 95% CI 3.0-29.4). Intradialytic hypotension (decline in systolic BP >20 mm Hg) was associated with a nine-fold greater rate of clinically significant arrhythmia during hemodialysis (IRR 9.4; 95% CI 3.0-29.4).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: