Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper reviews recent attempts to quantify the British industrial revolution. It concludes that the episode was one of rapid industrialization but modest growth. To a considerable extent this is explained by the early adoption of capitalist farming and the weak impact of steam on productivity growth. However, this should not detract from a marked acceleration in the rate of technological change by the second quarter of the 19th century. This may be explicable in an endogenous innovation framework in terms of a reduced cost of accessing useful knowledge. Models of long-run growth should take this enhanced technological capability seriously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholas Crafts (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: