Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We describe four improvements we have implemented in a version of the genetic linkage analysis programs in the LINKAGE package: subdivision of recombination classes, better handling of loops, better coordination between the optimization and output routines, and a checkpointing facility. The unifying theme for all the improvements is to store a small amount of data to avoid expensive recomputation of known results. The subdivision of recombination classes improves on a method of Lathrop and Lalouel [Am J Hum Genet 1988;42:498-505]. The new method of handling loops extends a proposal of Lange and Elston [Hum Hered 1975;25:95-105] for loopless pedigrees with multiple nuclear families at the earliest generation. From a practical point of view, the most important improvement may be the checkpointing facility which allows the user to carry out linkage computations that are much longer than the mean-time-to-failure of the underlying computer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ffer et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: