IS RACIAL research in medicine racist? Publications about comparative racial research number in the thousands. A review of the English-language medical literature reveals that there is a predilection for making comparisons between black and white patients, particularly with diseases associated with promiscuity, underachievement, and antisocial behavior. Reports on studies of sexually acquired diseases,¹⁻⁶suboptimal intellectual performance,⁷⁻⁹drug abuse,¹⁰,¹¹violence,¹²⁻¹⁴and sexual assault¹⁵⁻¹⁷are common. Other topics of racial comparison are differences in incidence of renal and cardiovascular¹⁸⁻²¹diseases and presumed racial differences in anatomy,²²,²³physiology,²⁴⁻²⁶and psychology.²⁷ See also pp 259 and 268. When race is used as a variable in research, there is a tendency to assume that the results obtained are a manifestation of the biology of racial differences; race as a variable implies that a genetic reason may explain differences in incidence, severity, or outcome of medical conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Newton G. Osborne (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: