Key result
SCAD clinical review provides no clinical data.
Why the study?
Significant areas of uncertainty remain regarding the best long-term management and surveillance strategies for spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
This review summarizes the current evidence on SCAD, highlighting the preference for conservative management in stable cases and the need for further research on long-term management.
SCAD review text contains no clinical data; leaves open questions on conservative management and long-term outcomes.
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has been increasingly recognized as a potentially serious nonatherosclerotic condition that can mimic atherosclerotic acute coronary syndromes. This condition has been identified as presenting with the classical clinical and electrocardiographic features that are encountered with acute coronary syndromes. Its formal identification has been historically challenging and difficult. A high index of clinical suspicion before invasive coronary angiography depends on the presence of some inherited and acquired risk factors. Early suspicion plays a key role in the identification of SCAD lesions during coronary angiography. Multiple angiographic features may be present, thus resulting in different types of SCAD lesions. Acute SCAD management favors conservative approaches for stable cases, with revascularization for high-risk presentations. Pharmacotherapy typically includes antiplatelet agents and β-blockers, avoiding routine anticoagulation. Long-term care involves recurrence prevention, monitoring, counseling, and screening for extra coronary fibromuscular dysplasia. Significant areas of uncertainty remain, as this relates to the best long-term management and surveillance strategies. This review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge and evidence, while pointing out the remaining challenges and the need for additional research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halabi et al. (2025) conducted a review in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection clinical review text provided contains only editorial board member names and no clinical data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: