Key result
Preoperative LVEF <50% (OR 3.63), WBC >10×10^9/L (OR 2.64), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.82), and LV end-diastolic dimension (OR 1.06) independently predicted early LV dysfunction after MVR.
Why the study?
The study sought to determine echocardiographic and nonechocardiographic predictors of early left ventricular dysfunction in patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing mitral valve replacement.
What are the predictors of early left ventricular dysfunction in patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing mitral valve replacement?
Cohort (n=571)
What are the predictors of early left ventricular dysfunction in patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing mitral valve replacement?
Effect estimate: OR 3.63 (for preoperative LVEF <50%)
Preoperative LV dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, elevated WBC count, and enlarged LV dimension independently predict early LV dysfunction following mitral valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease.
May aid preoperative risk stratification in rheumatic MVR; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding practice.
Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of early left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) after mitral valve replacement (MVR). We examined echocardiographic and nonechocardiographic predictors. Methods This study included 571 patients receiving MVR for RHD from 2012 to 2017. Their baseline characters, preoperative examination, operation data, and postoperative echocardiography were collected retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate the predictors of early LV dysfunction after MVR. The LV dysfunction was defined as left ventricular end‐ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. The interaction model was further performed to calculate interaction effects between predictors selected by logistic regression. Results In the 571 patients, 164 (28.7%) had early LV dysfunction after the operation, but only 94 (16.5%) had a preoperative LVEF <50%. Significant differences between two groups (LVEF ≥50% or LVEF <50%) were finally revealed in LV end‐diastolic dimension, preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), preoperative LVEF <50%, and the white blood cell (WBC) count measured after admission (>10 × 10 9 L −1 ) in the multivariate logistic regression. Corresponding odds ratios (ORs) were 1.06, 1.82, 3.63, and 2.64, respectively. Diabetes, lesion type, LV end‐systolic dimension, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and serum creatinine were statistically significant ( P < .05) in univariate logistic regression, with matched ORs 2.45, 1.66/0.65, 1.07, 2.50, 1.83, and 2.90, respectively. However, these variables were not significant anymore in the multivariate logistic model. Besides, the OR of early postoperative LV dysfunction increased to 7.00 when preoperative AF, preoperative LVEF <50%, and WBC >10 × 10 9 L −1 were all present. Conclusions The preoperative LV dysfunction, a large LV volume, AF and over‐normal WBC could independently predict postoperative LV dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in rheumatic heart disease (n=571). Mitral valve replacement was evaluated on early left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <50%) (OR 3.63 (for preoperative LVEF <50%)). Preoperative LVEF <50% (OR 3.63), WBC >10×10^9/L (OR 2.64), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.82), and LV end-diastolic dimension (OR 1.06) independently predicted early LV dysfunction after MVR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: