Why the study?
Does mitral valve replacement improve left ventricular and left atrial remodeling and functional class in patients with mixed mitral valve disease of rheumatic origin?
Does mitral valve replacement improve left ventricular and left atrial remodeling and functional class in patients with mixed mitral valve disease of rheumatic origin?
Mitral valve replacement in patients with rheumatic mixed mitral disease promotes favorable left ventricular and atrial remodeling and improves functional status, with total chordal preservation yielding better outcomes.
MVR was associated with remodeling and NYHA gains in rheumatic mixed disease; leaves open durability and selection criteria without randomized data.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the recovery of the left ventricle (LV) function, and to analyze postoperative size reduction of LV and left atrium (LA), after mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with chronic rheumatic mitral disease. METHODS: Thirty consecutive elective patients with MVR for mixed mitral disease of rheumatic origin formed the study group. Of these, 21 (70%) were women and the mean age was 37 years. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed prior to surgery, at three-month follow-up, and at three-year follow-up except for the latest nine patients. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 3.6 +/- 1.8 years. MVR surgery improved the functional class (mean New York Heart Association [NYHA] class) at three-year follow-up (p = 0.008). LV end-diastolic diameter and LA sizes decreased after MVR. Total chordal preservation causes better outcome, regarding to LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and NYHA functional class of patients. Preoperative high NYHA class, low LVEF, and high LV end-systolic diameter (LVESd) resulted with postoperative LV dysfunction (p were < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION: In patients with mixed mitral valve disease, MVR enhanced LV and LA remodeling resulting in better NYHA function. Preoperative NYHA, LVEF, and LVESd were significant predictors of postoperative LV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Topal et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: