Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The problem of comparing two treatments with respect to a continuous response variable, following an exponential distribution, is considered. It is assumed that a relevant comparative clinical trial is planned to either (i) test that the effect of one treatment is larger or not much smaller than that of the other, (ii) test whether the treatments are equivalent, or (iii) select the better treatment when they may not be equivalent and otherwise assert equivalence. Statistical procedures for achieving these goals are proposed and description of the required sample sizes is given with the necessary tables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bristol et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: